tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3406509183596335885.post-82402507292736910752008-05-07T07:40:00.000-04:002008-05-07T07:40:00.000-04:00I wouldn't go so far as to suggest that Nass articles are "meaningful pieces". They are unnecessarily lengthy, and the style in which they are written can only be described as self-indulgent and masturbatory. Maybe when the Nass is done trying too hard to be like the New Yorker it will be worth reading. The Prince's articles, however, are not meant to be pieces of literature. They are meant to be to-the-point and informative. It's absurd that the Nass wants to hold the Prince to the same standard that it can't even maintain itself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com